Los Angeles Therapist Abuse Lawyer

In California, illegal therapist abuse extends beyond just physical or sexual contact. It is legally defined primarily by the breach of professional duty and the exploitation of the power imbalance (transference) inherent in the therapeutic relationship. The law specifically prohibits a psychotherapist from engaging in any sexual contact with a patient during the period of therapy or within two years following its termination, regardless of whether the victim claims consent. This is codified under California Civil Code § 43.93. Abuse also includes therapeutic deception, where a therapist suggests that sexual contact is part of the patient's treatment, which is explicitly illegal. A skilled Los Angeles Therapist Abuse Lawyer handles civil cases covering all forms of exploitation, not just criminal acts.

The deadline to file a lawsuit (Statute of Limitations) in California for therapist abuse is complex and highly dependent on the victim's age and the nature of the abuse. In general:

• Adult Sexual Assault Claims (after Jan. 1, 2019): You generally have ten years from the date of the assault or three years from the date you discovered the injury caused by the assault, whichever is later.
• Childhood Sexual Abuse Claims (under 18): New laws have significantly extended this period. If the abuse occurred on or after January 1, 2024, there is no deadline to file a civil action. For older incidents, the deadline extends until the victim turns 40 years old or five years from the date of discovering the psychological injury.

Because of these shifting laws and the severity of the deadlines, consulting a Los Angeles attorney immediately is essential to protect your claim.

Yes, absolutely. While sexual misconduct is explicitly illegal, victims can file a civil lawsuit for severe emotional abuse, boundary violations, and professional negligence (malpractice). These claims may include: Professional Negligence (failing to meet the standard of care), Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED), or Common Law Negligence. Boundary violations—such as inappropriate out-of-session contact, excessive personal disclosures, or financial exploitation—damage the patient and can lead to recoverable compensation for the psychological harm and subsequent therapy costs.

As a victim, you may be entitled to recover both economic and non-economic damages. In California, recoverable compensation often includes:

• Economic Damages: Past and future medical and mental health therapy expenses (which can be substantial, often running into the millions for long-term care), lost wages, and loss of future earning capacity if the trauma affects your ability to work.
• Non-Economic Damages: Compensation for pain, suffering, and emotional distress (like PTSD, anxiety, and depression), for which California generally has no legal cap in private sector lawsuits.
• Punitive Damages: In cases involving extreme or egregious misconduct by the therapist or a cover-up by an institution, punitive damages may be awarded to punish the defendant and deter similar behavior in the future.

In California, the prohibition on sexual contact by a psychotherapist extends two years following the termination of therapy. If sexual contact occurred during this two-year window, it is considered unethical and illegal, and you can pursue a civil claim against the therapist under California Civil Code § 43.93. The law recognizes that the therapeutic imbalance and the therapist's influence persist long after formal sessions conclude, making any sexual relationship during this time inherently exploitative.

The therapist's employer or the facility where the abuse occurred (such as a clinic, hospital, or university) may be held vicariously liable or directly responsible if they were negligent. You can sue an institution if your attorney can prove that the organization: knew or should have known the therapist posed a risk, failed to properly supervise or investigate complaints, or participated in a cover-up. Suing an institution is often critical because most individual therapists do not possess the substantial financial resources needed to cover the significant damages awarded in severe abuse cases, making institutional liability essential for full recovery.

Proving abuse that happened in private sessions is challenging, but not impossible. An experienced Los Angeles Therapist Abuse Lawyer uses several forms of evidence to build a case:

• Documentation: Reviewing patient journals, texts, emails, and any other communications that show the grooming process or boundary violations that led to the abuse.
• Expert Testimony: Retaining mental health experts who can testify about the abuse of transference and the lasting psychological injuries suffered by the victim, which corroborates the claim.
• Therapy Records: Using post-abuse therapy records to document the symptoms and psychological damage directly resulting from the therapist's actions.
• Pattern of Behavior: Investigating if the therapist has a history of similar complaints or has been disciplined by the licensing board.

While civil lawsuits are technically part of the public record in Los Angeles County Superior Court, most therapist abuse cases settle out of court before reaching a public trial, often due to the defendant's fear of career-ending publicity. Your attorney can take steps to protect your privacy:

• Filing as Jane/John Doe: In many cases, the lawsuit can be filed using a pseudonym (Jane or John Doe) to shield your identity from the public record.
• Confidential Settlement: If the case settles, a confidentiality clause is almost always included in the settlement agreement, legally preventing both sides from discussing the case or disclosing the settlement amount.

Filing a civil lawsuit is separate from filing a complaint with the therapist's licensing board (such as the California Board of Psychology or the Board of Behavioral Sciences). However, a civil lawsuit often triggers an investigation by the licensing board, especially if allegations of sexual misconduct are raised. While the civil case seeks monetary damages for the victim, the licensing board case seeks to discipline the therapist (e.g., license suspension or revocation) to protect the public. An attorney can handle both actions simultaneously.

No. Having an existing emotional or mental health condition does not hurt your therapist abuse case; in fact, it is foundational to it. The law recognizes that a patient seeking help is in a vulnerable position, which is precisely why the therapist holds a heightened legal and ethical duty of care. The defendant cannot argue that the victim "consented" or that their pre-existing condition somehow caused the abuse. Instead, a successful claim demonstrates how the therapist's abusive actions aggravated or worsened your existing condition, leading to greater, quantifiable damages.