Trusted, Honored, and Awarded
Over $225 Million Recovered For Our Clients

Toyota recall scandal results in another court loss for automaker

With the major auto recall scandals of the past year, it is easy to forget about earlier events that dominated the news just a few years ago. Perhaps the most notable was the Toyota recall related to sticking pedals and issues of “sudden, unintended acceleration.” The first cases to make headlines involved devastating car accidents here in California.

While much of the scandal played out publicly between 2009 and 2011, Toyota continues to face legal repercussions. Earlier this month, in fact, a judge increased a jury award stemming from a February trial. The award against Toyota was increased from $10 million to about $14 million in damages.

The accident that sparked the lawsuit occurred way back in 2006 and involved an allegedly defective Toyota Camry made in 1996. In that accident, a Minnesota man was driving with his family (including his pregnant wife) when his brakes allegedly malfunctioned and he slammed his car into a vehicle stopped at a red light.

Three people were killed in the crash and two more were badly injured. The Camry driver was charged with and convicted of careless driving and vehicular homicide. He spent years in prison before news of the Toyota recall allowed him to challenge his convictions.

In a separate trial earlier this year, the jury found Toyota liable and awarded plaintiffs $10 million. The Camry driver was also deemed responsible for the crash but only 40 percent responsible. He was also awarded damages in the jury ruling. Earlier this month, the judge increased the total award to $14 million in recognition of what many of the plaintiffs had suffered.

Victims who have been seriously injured or lost loved ones in a car accident often find themselves struggling with even the most basic aspects of recovery. If the legal aftermath of the crash involves criminal prosecution and allegations of product liability, things become even more complicated. Hopefully, decisions made by the jury and judge will help all victims gain a sense of closure and healing.

Source: Courthouse News Service, “Toyota Must Pay $14M Liability for 2006 Crash,” Adam Klasfeld, June 16, 2015

Damage cap could leave Amtrak train crash victims shortchanged

Travel by rail has long been a transportation option in the United States, but use of trains has not been widespread. For most of the past century, the automobile has been king, largely thanks to an impressive highway system and the cost effectiveness of mass production.

Here in California, light rail trains have come into greater use in major cities. And nationwide, train travel seems to be on the rise. Unfortunately, the increase in train ridership has been accompanied by an increase in serious train accidents. These include accidents at railroad crossings and accidents involving train derailment.

One of the largest accidents in recent history was the derailment of an Amtrak train in Philadelphia in May. In that accident, a train traveling at more than twice the safe speed limit derailed when going around a curve in the tracks. Eight people were killed and more than 200 suffered injuries. Many of those injuries were severe, and some victims have already incurred hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills. Approximately two dozen lawsuits have so far been filed against Amtrak.

Sadly, there is a problem that could leave victims with unpaid medical bills and other costs, even after being compensated. In the late 1990s, when Congress reauthorized Amtrak, legislators put a cap on the company’s liability for any single accident. The cap of $200 million was meant to ensure that railroad companies were not forced out of operation by major lawsuits.

If the cap stays in place, the more than 208 victims and their families will have to share that fixed amount of money. It may seem like a large amount, but it will likely be insufficient to adequately cover all medical bills and other costs victims incurred related to the accident. Instead of compensating each victim/family the full amount that they need and deserve, judges may be forced to prioritize some victims over others based on the limitations of an arbitrary damage cap.

There’s a possibility that the cap could be raised to $295 million because of a provision in the most recent bill to finance the Highway Trust Fund. But even if it passes, the higher cap will still likely be too small to fully compensate victims.

It’s unclear exactly how the Amtrak cases will play out. But as America continues to expand its investment in rail travel (including California’s plans for high-speed rail), train accident liability is an issue that will only become more pressing.

Drunk drivers over the July 4th holiday

This coming weekend there is a fairly good chance that people throughout the Oakland area will celebrate the nation’s birthday by consuming alcoholic beverages. In situations such as this it is likely that some people will get into their car to drive despite being over the legal limit. As a result of that activity it is possible that a motor vehicle accident could occur.

Any time a car accident takes place it is possible that serious injuries could be the result. When someone suffers a traumatic brain injury or spinal injury, his or her life can be changed forever.

In the most serious situations those involved in the crash could die. When those individuals have not done anything wrong, and their injuries or loss of life could have been avoided, the situation is even more difficult to handle.

Following an accident of this nature those involved or impacted may be unsure about what their options are. In the midst of grieving about what has happened, it may be tempting to take the easiest path in resolving legal matters that arise. Agreeing to a settlement with the insurance company of the drunk driver without having a lawyer there to advocate for you could be a big mistake. Initial offers are almost always low and may not come anywhere near covering the expenses that arise as a result of the drunk driving accident.

Regardless of when the drunk driving accident occurs, if you suffer injuries in the incident you need to make sure you get what you deserve. An attorney can assist with that. For more information on filing a claim following a drunk driving accident please see our website.

Fatal building collapse brings criminal charges & lawsuits

In news reports about construction and demolition accidents, the injured victims are often workers doing the construction or demolition. They may have been harmed due to negligent planning, unsafe working conditions or a host of other safety hazards.

As tragic as these cases are, it is even more tragic to hear about construction/demolition accidents that injure and kill others near the worksite. In densely populated cities here in California and throughout the country, on-the-job safety is even more important precisely because of how close worksites may be to neighboring buildings.

Readers here in the Bay Area may remember a tragedy that occurred two years ago on the other side of the country. In June 2013, a masonry wall collapsed during building demolition and fell onto a one-story Salvation Army thrift store next to the worksite. The collapse killed six people and left another 13 victims injured.

Two people faced criminal charges in the wake of the accident: The operator of the excavator and the demolition contractor who hired him. An accident investigation revealed that the contractor ordered the demolition of the front and rear walls first because he wanted to salvage wooden beams and joists in the demolished buildings. This left a three-story masonry wall unsupported by the rest of the structure. That wall should have been dismantled by hand from the top down.

The excavator operator recently pled guilty to several criminal charges and will likely be imprisoned for between 10 and 20 years. The contractor has yet to be tried. The two men and the site developer have also been named as defendants in a number of civil lawsuits.

After accidents like this, it is common for victims and their families to seek compensation for personal injury, wrongful death and premises liability. While no amount of money can replace what has been lost, victim compensation is nonetheless necessary and appropriate.

Source: Philly.com, “Guilty plea in Salvation Army thrift store collapse,” Joseph A. Slobodzian, July 21, 2015

Possibly drunk driver kills 1 pedestrian, injures 5 others

While the following story is a bit older, it brings up the very important matter of pedestrian accidents. In this case, the accident turned tragic when a drunk driver plowed into numerous pedestrians on the sidewalk.

The wreck occurred last month in Vallejo, California, when a 65-year-old man was allegedly driving around with alcohol in his system. Police have confirmed that the driver likely had "intoxication issues." The driver hit six pedestrians in total and he damaged numerous pieces of property along the sidewalk in the process.

One of the pedestrians was killed in the accident, while five other pedestrians were either hospitalized in conditions that ranged from serious to critical. 

This is obviously an extreme example of a pedestrian accident, but if the driver involved was indeed intoxicated, he will rightly suffer the consequences for his actions. Still, even though this wreck may seem straightforward and clear-cut, the legal claims involved could be more complicated than it may seem.

Pedestrian accidents are often more convoluted than they need to be. That doesn't mean that an injured pedestrian should balk at the idea of pursuing legal action. Far from it, in fact. Instead, this is just something to keep in mind if you are pursuing such litigation. 

Negligence on the part of a driver or reckless driving often plays a role in pedestrian accident. Proving this negligence or recklessness can be difficult, but armed with this evidence, an injured pedestrian can (and should) consider legal action to help him or her get the justice they deserve.

Source: KRON, "Six pedestrians involved in deadly Vallejo accident; intoxication may have been a factor," Annie Andersen, June 19, 2015

Take me out to the ballgame – then to the hospital

For many Americans, there’s no place better to spend a summer evening than the ballpark. Baseball is still America’s pastime, and going to major league games provides great nostalgia as well as entertainment.

We’re all familiar with the sensory experience at the ballpark: The smell of the food, the sound of the crack of the bat. But what about the sting of the foul ball, or the concussion caused by a broken bat? Fan injuries caused by balls and bats are surprisingly common, and these incidents can even be fatal. According to one study, about 1,750 fans are injured each year while attending major league games – mostly by foul balls.

Do injured fans have legal recourse, or do we just have to accept the risks associated with watching the game in-person? This is a difficult question to answer, because courts around the United States don’t always rule consistently on issues related to spectator injuries.

Many baseball parks include warnings on tickets, signs and in PA announcements essentially saying that the owners assume no liability for injuries suffered as a result of flying objects related to the game (bats, balls, etc). They also argue in court that watching baseball is an inherently dangerous activity, and fans know or should know the risks they are taking.

Does this mean, however, that stadium owners don’t have to make the game as safe as it can reasonably be for spectators? Recently, an Oakland A’s fan filed a lawsuit in Northern California against Major League Baseball. The plaintiff, who is seeking class-action status on behalf of other fans, argues that safety netting should be installed in every major league stadium down the first and third base lines. In her opinion, these nets should extend all the way to the foul poles.

Team and stadium owners must walk a fine line when it comes to safety vs. entertainment. On one hand, spectators like the idea of catching a foul ball. On the other hand, no fan wants to suffer permanent brain damage or death as the result of a speeding ball or broken piece of bat. And stadium owners don’t want to face premises liability lawsuits, even if their liability protection is well established.

It will be interesting to see how this lawsuit will impact netting policies at major league stadiums, if at all.

Dealing with the drawn-out aftermath of an auto accident

Although an automobile accident can happen in an instant, the aftermath of that accident can play out for years. If the crash is severe – leading to serious injury or death – victims and their families can be left with physical and emotional damage that may never go away.

That very well may be the case for comedian Tracy Morgan, who was seriously injured in a truck accident in June 2014. Readers may remember that as Morgan and friends were driving back from a comedy show, a dangerously fatigued truck driver slammed into the back of their limousine, killing one passenger and injuring others.

According to news reports, Tracy Morgan has only recently begun making television appearances and giving interviews. The crash left him with broken bones and a traumatic brain injury. Since that day, he has struggled with memory issues and has even had to relearn how to walk.

As bad as his physical injuries are, Mr. Morgan seems to struggle equally with the loss of James McNair, who was better known as Jimmy Mack. McNair was Morgan’s friend and “comrade in comedy,” and was killed while riding with Morgan that day.

Finally, the legal aftermath of an automobile accident can also drag on for months or years. The truck driver who caused the crash is facing serious criminal charges and may also be facing a number of civil lawsuits as well, but none of these matters have yet been resolved. And it was only recently that the National Transportation Safety Board completed its official investigation into the crash. Unsurprisingly, the NTSB confirmed that the crash was primarily caused by fatigued driving.

A car or truck accident can change life in an instant. Sometimes that means losing a loved one. Sometimes that means suffering serious injury or permanent disability. Often, it means months of paperwork, phone calls and long waits to resolve insurance and legal issues.

If you’ve been injured or lost a loved one in a preventable auto accident, the aftermath can feel overwhelming. But if you decide that legal action is necessary, hiring an experienced and caring attorney can make the process much easier and less frustrating.

Plaintiffs in premises liability cases can share blame for injuries

In our post last week, we discussed amusement park accidents. Normally, parks in California and around the country tend to be very safe while creating the illusion of danger on their thrill rides. But these rides can and do malfunction, and when this happens, park visitors are put in real danger of injury and death.

That being said, amusement park patrons sometimes contribute to their own injuries by acting negligently. In matters of premises liability, California uses the doctrine of comparative negligence. This simply means that if a plaintiff was partially to blame for his own injuries, his compensation may be reduced by the percentage of blame assigned to him.

This past week, a tragic and fatal accident at an amusement park in Ohio provided a grim reminder of how park visitors sometimes contribute to or cause accidents. According to news sources, a man was killed after being struck by a roller coaster train he had recently finished riding. The man reportedly hopped a security fence in order to retrieve a cellphone he had dropped during his ride on the coaster, which is called “the Raptor.”

Because this incident happened so recently, no lawsuits have been filed, and it is unknown if the matter will be criminally investigated. Moreover, based on the details reported, liability is far from clear. On one hand, a very dangerous area exists at the amusement park, wherein a rollercoaster passes near the ground. On the other hand, it was a restricted area with a security fence to keep guests out.

Some accidents on private property are clearly the fault of the property owner or the person who was injured. But in many cases, liability is not cut-and-dried. If you or a loved one has been injured on someone else’s property, an experienced personal injury attorney can help you better understand your rights and legal options.

Northern California teen killed in crosswalk to donate organs

A tragic car accident has left a high school freshman dead in San Jose, California, after she was struck by a truck near her school. The incident was just one of several serious pedestrian accidents throughout the area in late November that included at least two other fatalities.

Official reports show that the 14-year-old girl, who attended James Lick High School, was struck by a vehicle as she crossed the street at about 8 p.m. on Nov. 24. The girl had made it about halfway across the street, and a driver in the southbound lanes had stopped to let her go when she was struck by a driver who apparently did not see her. The young woman was alone at the time of the wreck.

It is not clear whether any criminal charges will be filed in connection with the accident since the driver of the Mazda minivan stayed at the scene to assist investigators. The girl's family said that she was declared brain dead shortly after the collision. She remains on life support pending organ donation, which they believe would have been her wish.

A rash of other pedestrian accidents in the area also left a 3-year-old child dead on Nov. 24 as he was being pushed across the street in a stroller by a 13-year-old family member. The driver in that case failed to yield to the children as they crossed the street on their way to a nearby park.

Even though we teach our children to take care while crossing the street, little can be done by parents to prevent inattentive drivers from plowing into these young victims. Drivers who cause such wrecks may not be subject to criminal consequences, but they should be held accountable for their actions in civil court. Family members of such victims may be able to recover financial compensation for wrongful death, loss of consort and a variety of other civil claims.

Source: www.insidebayarea.com, "San Jose: Organs of James Lick High student hit by car will be donated" Robert Salonga, Nov. 26, 2013

The hit-and-run epidemic plaguing California cities

Here in Oakland and in many other major cities around the country, pedestrians find themselves at odds with an automobile culture. In many cases, simply crossing a heavily traveled street can literally be a fight for survival.

Pedestrian accident injury/fatality rates are already unacceptably high. Adding to this problem is another serious issue: a rise in the number of hit-and-run accidents. The rate of hit-and-run crashes has steadily increased nationwide over the past few years, and California's largest city has the unfortunate distinction of being "ground zero" for cowardly drivers who flee the scene after causing an accident.

Hit-and-run fatalities increased by 13.7 percent between 2009 and 2011 according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. It is worth noting that this increase occurred during a three-year period in which the overall rate of traffic deaths was decreasing.

Law enforcement agencies and safety advocates say that many drivers who flee the scene do so because they were already doing something illegal prior to the accident, such as driving drunk or driving without a license.

In response to this growing problem, lawmakers around the country are working to increase the penalties for hit-and-run accidents and make it easier to prosecute the offending drivers. Here in California, for instance, legislators recently passed a law that increases the statute of limitations in hit-and-run cases. When it takes effect next July, the statute of limitations will be six years instead of the current three.

Hit-and-run drivers are cowardly and irresponsible, but their offense is more significant than simply trying to avoid prosecution. The crash may have been an accident, but by fleeing the scene, the offending driver makes the choice to refuse aid to the person they just hit. One California legislator put it best when he said "it really comes down to folks being left for dead on the side of the road by the person who is in the best position to call 911."

Unfortunately, some hit-and-run drivers are never caught. But those who are may face serious criminal consequences as well as a civil lawsuit alleging personal injury or wrongful death.

Source: USA Today, "Fatal hit-and-run crashes on rise in U.S.," Larry Copeland, Nov. 10, 2013 

If You Are Wronged, We Will Make It Right. Schedule A Free Confidential Consultation At Winer, Burritt, Scott & Jacobs, LLP, we empower our clients. We take on the largest law firms, toughest insurance defense lawyers and largest companies with confidence. * Bold text labels are required for submission | We practice in California only.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.