Trusted, Honored, and Awarded
Over $225 Million Recovered For Our Clients

Truck accident blamed on exploding e-cigarette

At this point, Americans are quite familiar with product liability claims related to automobiles. The Takata air bag scandal is just the latest in a frequent string of recalls for dangerous and defective parts in cars and trucks. Sometimes these defects cause motor vehicle accidents and sometimes they make crashes more likely to be fatal.

It is far rarer to hear about auto accidents caused by defective products that are not actually part of the vehicle. That was apparently the scenario in a recent 18-wheeler accident in the Midwest. According to news sources, the driver of the truck lost control of the vehicle and crashed into a highway guardrail when the e-cigarette he was holding suddenly exploded.

Thankfully, no other vehicles were involved in the crash and the truck driver's crash-related injuries were minor. He did, however, suffer injuries related to the exploding device.

In recent years, e-cigarettes have become an incredibly popular alternative to traditional smoking. This is despite a lack of evidence to support claims that they pose less of a health risk than smoking tobacco products. While this seems to be one of the first reported cases of a crash related to e-cigarettes, there have been other reports of the devices exploding during use. Incidents like this one could lead to personal injury lawsuits, product liability claims and more stringent regulation of these devices.

Although the truck accident occurred in the Midwest, it just as easily could have happened here in California, and with deadlier results. Hopefully, any problems with these apparently dangerous devices will be resolved before such an accident happens again.

Hoverboard fire nearly kills two children trapped in home

Last month, we wrote about an increasing number of spontaneous fires associated with “hoverboards,” which became a fad just before the holiday season. These Segway-like vehicles are made by a number of different manufacturers (but not Segway), and many suffer from one very dangerous defect: Their powerful batteries can overheat and burst into flame.

Some incidents have resulted in burn injuries and significant property damage to homes, including a home here in California. But in January, one hoverboard fire caused a house to burn to the ground, and the two children trapped inside only narrowly escaped with their lives.

The family of six lives in Nashville, Tennessee. The hoverboard was a Christmas present for the family’s 14-year-old son. The teen’s parents did their research, both before and after buying the product. They bought their particular make and model based on good Amazon reviews. When news outlets later reported fire dangers associated with hoverboards, they continued to check online for information. The product still seemed safe, but the parents nonetheless gave the gift with an important caveat: It could only be charged when someone was around to keep an eye on it (fires were most likely to happen while it was plugged in and charging).

On the day of the fire, the hoverboard was not being charged, but it had been stored on the floor between two couches – a toy clean-up habit the teen had learned when he was younger. He and his sister were both upstairs, and didn’t realize the house was on fire until it was already out of control. Thankfully, both were able to escape and suffered relatively minor injuries.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission has received more than 50 reports of hoverboard fires. The commission says that many of these products were not manufactured in compliance with existing safety standards, and it has vowed to recall any and all hoverboards found to be faulty.

If your family owns a hoverboard, please understand just how dangerous these products can be and act accordingly. Even keeping one in your home could present a serious fire hazard. And if you have already been injured by a defective hoverboard, you may want to speak with an experienced Oakland personal injury attorney about your rights and legal options.

NHTSA says software can be considered a driver in autonomous cars

We have previously written about the intriguing possibilities of self-driving cars. This topic is especially interesting to people here in the Bay Area, because Google's autonomous vehicle technology seems to be further along than that of other groups working on this important project.

In December, we wrote about proposed rules issued by the California Department of Motor Vehicles that would require licensed, human drivers to "be present inside the vehicle and be capable of taking control in the event of a technology failure or other emergency." Critics have said that these rules could really slow the progress of innovation. But earlier this month, news from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration seemingly cleared away a major regulatory hurdle.

In a letter that the NHTSA sent to Google, the agency said it "will interpret 'driver' in the context of Google's described motor vehicle design as referring to the (self-driving system), and not to any of the vehicle occupants." In other words, the car's self-driving software could be considered a "driver" for regulatory purposes.

The possibility of self-driving vehicles is exciting from both a convenience standpoint and a safety standpoint. Human error is the cause of or a contributing factor to the vast majority of car accidents. Many tech enthusiasts have predicted that once self-driving vehicles become ubiquitous, the rate of car accidents in the U.S. will decrease dramatically.

On the other hand, we truly don't know how such software will perform. The high number of safety recalls in recent years is a reminder that automakers are not always giving vehicle safety the attention it deserves. If and when accidents do occur, auto companies (and software developers they contract with) could potentially be held liable as both negligent manufacturers and negligent drivers.

The time for self-driving vehicles has not arrived yet, but there is reason to believe it is just around the corner. Hopefully, regulators will not wait to address these important liability questions.

Premises liability involving hazards at traveling events

Whenever an outdoor, temporary structure is built for commercial reasons (like a music festival, for instance), it is crucial for event organizers to take all reasonable precautions. A giant tent may not seem dangerous, but accidents involving wind or structural collapse can be deadly.

Such a scenario seems to occur at least once each year somewhere in the United States – including here in the Bay Area. Last fall, a tent collapse at a traveling circus in New Hampshire was responsible for two deaths and dozens of injuries. An investigation into the accident revealed that the company responsible for setting up the tent failed to erect it properly and also ignored multiple high-wind warnings from the National Weather Service.

The accident was investigated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration because at least two circus employees were injured. OSHA inspectors determined that the tent had not been erected in accordance with specific diagrams provided by a professional engineer.

The tent also should have been taken down (and performances cancelled) when wind speeds were forecast at more than 60 miles per hour. The company reportedly decided to hold a performance that day despite seven high-wind warnings.

In all, OSHA cited the company for 14 serious violations and proposed fines of nearly $34,000. The company will likely need to pay this amount in addition to any personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits that may have been filed by attendees and their families.

Whether it’s a circus, a music festival, a traveling carnival or any other event, anyone who buys a ticket has a reasonable expectation of safety. When event organizers fail to protect those in attendance, they may be held legally liable.

Why You Should Wear a Helmet When Riding a Bicycle

Riding a bicycle has become the preferred mode of travel for many in Oakland and around the Bay Area. The health benefits are obvious, and depending on where you work, biking can provide a faster commute than driving a car. But there are also some definite drawbacks and risks associated with riding a bike, including getting struck by a motor vehicle.

Following basic safety precautions is crucial for all travelers, but especially so for pedestrians and bicyclists. Perhaps the most important safety measure bicyclists can take is choosing to wear a helmet each and every time they ride.

From time to time, certain studies try to suggest that wearing safety gear can actually make us less safe because of a concept known as “risk homeostasis.” The theory is that wearing helmets and other protective equipment gives us a false sense of security, making us more likely to take risks that we would otherwise avoid.

While risk homeostasis sounds plausible, it remains controversial. More importantly, there don’t seem to be any studies showing definitively that the benefits of wearing a helmet are ever outweighed by the potential for encouraging riskier behavior. But there is an overwhelming body of research to show that bicycle helmets save lives and reduce the severity of injuries when injuries occur. The same is true for motorcycle helmets.

Risk homeostasis could potentially be a problem for some bicyclists. But the message here is simple: You should always wear a helmet and ride defensively. You don’t need to choose one or the other.

Unfortunately, even the most careful bicyclists can suffer serious injuries caused by motorists. If you have been injured due to the negligence of a driver, please seek the help of an experienced Oakland personal injury attorney.

Traffic fatality rates are climbing after years of decline

The safety of road travel in the United States has been improving for decades. Between 2000 and 2014, for instance, annual traffic fatalities declined by 22 percent. That is real, measurable progress.

Unfortunately, preliminary numbers from 2015 suggest that the trend is quickly reversing. In the first nine months of 2015, the rate of traffic fatalities in the U.S. increased 9.3 percent, compared to the same period a year earlier. In human terms, 2015 saw an estimated 26,000 car accident deaths in less than a year.

According to a press release from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, regulators are very concerned by these statistics. In response, the NHTSA is holding a series of regional summits to discuss mitigation strategies and address the human factors underlying many fatal crashes. These include drunk driving, distracted driving, drowsy driving, speeding, failing to wear a seat belt and failure to use child seats. The agency also wants to address ways to increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

The first summit was held earlier this month in California's capitol. Commenting on the effort, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx noted that “For decades, U.S. DOT has been driving safety improvements on our roads, and those efforts have resulted in a steady decline in highway deaths. But the apparent increase in 2015 is a signal that we need to do more. The safety summits that NHTSA is kicking off today in Sacramento will provide us with new approaches to add to the tried-and-true tactics that we know save lives.”

Observers may have noticed that this increasing concern about human driving behavior comes at a time when autonomous vehicles could soon become a reality. It will be interesting to find out whether dangerous driver choices will hasten the adoption of self-driving vehicles.

Why are deadly motor coach bus accidents so common?

In recent years, California roads and highways have been plagued by some devastating and high-profile bus accidents. Many of these accidents involved commercial motor coach companies offering low-fare trips between cities (and states).

There are certainly reputable and reliable carriers. But overall, the motor coach transportation industry is plagued by companies seeking to make a quick buck however and whenever they can. Sadly, the very low fares some companies are able to offer come at the cost of safety.

Since it first began operating in 2006, the company Megabus has made a name for itself across the United States – primarily by offering incredibly low fares for certain trips. In some cases, passengers can ride one way for as little as $1.

But those low prices may come with hidden costs – and not just in the form of extra fees. Megabus has been associated with several injurious and fatal accidents over the past few years. In 2010, four passengers were killed when a double-decker Megabus struck a railroad overpass in New York State.

In 2014, a rollover accident injured 26 passengers in Indiana. A year later, another Megabus crash resulted in 19 injuries.

And recently, a columnist for the New York Times wrote about his own harrowing experience when the Megabus he was riding in caught fire for inexplicable reasons. Passengers were able to escape uninjured, but nearly all luggage stored in the lower compartments was destroyed when the whole bus became engulfed in flames.

To be sure, Megabus is not the only motor coach company with a bad safety record. In fact, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has found it very difficult to regulate this industry overall. Fly-by-night companies may get shut down, only to reopen under different names.

If you ever rely on bus transportation between cities or states, please understand the risks that often hide behind the promise of low fares. Before you buy a ticket from any carrier, take the time to do some online research. A company's safety record should tell you all you need to know.

California drunk driving accidents: bicyclist injured in accident

A car accident involving a drunk driver and a bicyclist occurred recently. The accident occurred in Marin County on a recent Friday in March, California Highway Patrol said. Similarly, when California residents are injured in drunk driving accidents, they are typically entitled to file personal injury suits against the responsible party or parties.

The collision took place around 9 p.m. in Sausalito. According to witness reports, a bicyclist was struck by a minivan, which then left the scene of the accident, driving north on Highway 101. A witness called 911 and followed the vehicle. Shortly thereafter, the driver allegedly pulled over at a gas station and proceeded to switch seats with a passenger.

A police officer in Tiburon had heard about the earlier collision and was able to locate and stop the minivan. Police then determined that both the driver and the passenger were intoxicated. They also determined that the vehicle's passengers had switched seats, a CHP officer said. The driver at the time of the collision, a 50-year-old Tiburon woman, is now facing felony charges, while her passenger, a 40-year-old San Francisco woman, is now facing misdemeanor charges. The cyclist, a 54-year-old San Rafael man was treated at the scene of the accident.

When California drunk driving accidents cause serious injuries as a result of drivers' negligence, the victims are typically entitled to file personal injury claims for financial relief. When this type of claim is successfully navigated, any restitution paid can be used to help alleviate some of the financial burdens imposed on the victim of a serious car accident. Damages typically include medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost pay and other documented financial losses. Victims of car accidents typically consult personal injury attorneys to determine the validity of legal claims and for ongoing support in seeking justice in civil courts.

Source: marinij.com, "Tiburon woman accused of DUI hit-and-run against cyclist in Sausalito", Gary Klien, March 13, 2016

Car accidents continue to claim lives on California highways

It is rare for people to walk away unscathed after a highway car wreck, but crashes that involve entire families are especially tragic for survivors. This is even more devastating when car accidents leave young children behind without parents, which could very well change the course of their entire lives. A recent wreck in California demonstrates how a single accident can have terrible consequences.

According to authorities, two vehicles were involved in an crash on Highway 4 in Contra Costa County. A van carrying six family members was traveling westbound on the highway when an eastbound truck crossed the center line. The van tried to swerve to miss the truck, but was unsuccessful and the two vehicles collided. The van landed upside down in a canal beside the highway.

A bystander saw the accident, and helped the passengers out of the submerged van. Three children, ages 10, nine and two and a 24-year-old cousin were all taken to a nearby medical center with minor injuries. The mother and father of the children perished from injuries sustained in the crash. In addition, the truck driver suffered major injuries and was taken to a hospital.

According to a GoFundMe page, the oldest child of the couple stated that the children’s lives “were changed forever” due to this accident and blamed it on the truck driver falling asleep at the wheel. The California Highway Patrol is still investigating the cause at this time. Alcohol has not been listed as a contributing factor for the wreck.

After catastrophic car accidents such as this, it is vital that survivors and family members seek legal representation quickly. The surviving victims of such a terrible wreck may need financial support for mounting medical bills due to injuries sustained and potential lost wages. Likewise, the family of a deceased victim may need compensation to defray funeral costs or the loss of a financially providing family member. An experienced California legal representative can explain the options available.

Source: Martinez, Ca. Patch, “Martinez parents killed in crash identified; GoFundMe account set up to help children“, Dave Colby, March 17, 2016

Drunk driving accidents continue to kill innocents in California

Fatal car wrecks caused by drunk drivers are tragic in any circumstance, but those that claim the life of a child are especially difficult. When anyone in California takes the wheel after imbibing too much alcohol or other substances, they typically do not consider the devastating consequences that may occur. A recent crash in Tulare County demonstrates how horrific drunk driving accidents can be.

According to police, a family from Las Vegas left Yosemite National Park on their return trip home last Saturday night. The car held a 10-year-old, her parents and her grandmother. Their car was hit broad-side by an SUV when a 25-year-old driver in another vehicle flew through a stop sign.

A motorist witnessed the accident and ran to help the victims. He helped the mother untangle the father from the wreckage, and then pulled the child out of the car. She was rushed to a local medical center for treatment but passed away from her injuries. The grandmother died at the scene of the accident. The driver who caused the accident was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated and also with two counts of manslaughter.

Dealing with death and/or injuries incurred from drunk driving accidents can be devastating for survivors and their families. People facing these situations typically benefit by seeking legal representation as quickly as possible, as they may face mounting medical bills and have to contend with lost wages from time away from work. A lawyer familiar with the California legal system can best guide survivors through this trying time.

Source: abc30.com, "Suspected DUI driver kills girl and grandmother in Tulare crash", Brian Johnson, March 29, 2016

If You Are Wronged, We Will Make It Right. Schedule A Free Confidential Consultation At Winer, Burritt & Scott, LLP, we empower our clients. We take on the largest law firms, toughest insurance defense lawyers and largest companies with confidence. * Bold text labels are required for submission | We practice in California only.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.